WINDEL v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH

Supreme Court No. S-17159.

496 P.3d 392 (2021)

Keven WINDEL and Marlene Windel, Appellants, v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

October 8, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth P. Jacobus , Kenneth P. Jacobus, P.C., Anchorage, and Marlene Windel and Keven Windel, pro se, Wasilla, for Appellants.

John Aschenbrenner , Deputy Borough Attorney, and Nicholas Spiropoulos , Borough Attorney, Matanuska-Susitna Borough Attorney's Office, Palmer, for Appellee.

Before: Bolger, Chief Justice, Winfree, Maassen, Carney, and Borghesan, Justices.


OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION

Property owners sued the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, challenging the validity of easements that cross their property to give access to neighboring residences. The superior court dismissed most of the property owners' claims on res judicata grounds, reasoning that the claims had been brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases