TWEEDY v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH BD.

No. S-15034.

332 P.3d 12 (2014)

Clifton O. TWEEDY, Appellant, v. MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 15, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Baird , Office of Ronald L. Baird, Anchorage, for Appellant.

John Aschenbrenner , Deputy Borough Attorney, and Nicholas Spiropoulos , Borough Attorney, Palmer, for Appellee.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, WINFREE, STOWERS, MAASSEN, and BOLGER, Justices.


OPINION ON REHEARING

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Clifton Tweedy began leasing property from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough on Big Lake in May 1988. The property included a house that was built in 1968 and located less than 18 feet from the lakeshore. When Tweedy assumed the lease, the existing structure was exempt from the Borough's 75-foot shoreline setback ordinance because it was constructed before any setback requirement existed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases