ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered this matter at its March 7, 2017, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that the Petitioner's sentence is facially invalid as to counts one and three because the underlying criminal acts occurred before former RCW 9.94A.712 went into effect, thus making the Petitioner's claim of facial sentencing error exempt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.