1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 319 P.3d
  5. 319 P.3d 811 (2014)
 

STATE v. CARDENAS-MURATALLA

No. 68057-9-I.

319 P.3d 811 (2014)

179 Wn. App. 307

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Jose Manuel CARDENAS-MURATALLA, aka Jose Manuel Cardenas-Muralta, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

February 3, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Washington Appellate Project, Thomas Michael Kummerow , Washington Appellate Project, Susan F. Wilk , Law Office of Michael Iaria, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Prosecuting Atty King County, King Co Pros/App Unit Supervisor, Erin Hairopoulos Becker , King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 To be valid under both state and federal law, a warrantless, investigatory stop, or Terry1 stop, must be reasonable, and it is the State's burden to prove reasonableness. An investigatory stop is reasonable if the arresting officer can testify to specific and objective facts that provide a reasonable suspicion that the person stopped has committed or is about to commit a crime. In determining whether an investigatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases