1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 261 P.3d
  5. 261 P.3d 1185 (2011)
 

IN RE JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2011-3

No. 2011-3.

261 P.3d 1185 (2011)

2011 OK JUD ETH 3

JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2011-3.

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.

July 6, 2011.

JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL

¶ 1 Questions: May a Judge hold an internet social account, such as Facebook, Twitter, or Linkedin without violating the Code of Judicial Conduct?

¶ 2 2. May a Judge who owns an internet based social media account add court staff, law enforcement officers, social workers, attorneys and others who may appear in his or her court as "friends" on the account?

¶ 3 Answers: Question 1—Yes, with restrictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases