1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 99 A.D.3d
  5. 99 A.D.3d 190 (2012)
 

MATTER OF ATTORNEYS

Not in source.

99 A.D.3d 190 (2012)

951 N.Y.S.2d 687

2012 NY Slip Op 6492

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1, Respondents. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEES FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

August 3, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Drake , Principal Counsel, Seventh judicial District Grievance Committee, Rochester, for petitioner.

Respondents pro se.

CENTRA, J.P. PERADOTTO, LINDLEY and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Grievance Committees moved to suspend respondents from the practice of law on the ground that they violated Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 by failing to comply with attorney registration requirements. In support of the motion, the Grievance Committees alleged that they and the Office of Court Administration sent to respondents numerous written notices concerning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases