1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 144 A.3d
  5. 144 A.3d 916 (2016)
 

MUELLER v. MUELLER

Not in source.

144 A.3d 916 (2016)

446 N.J. Super. 582

Gordon MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. Rosemary S. MUELLER, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Ocean County.

Decided: April 22, 2016

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon Mueller, plaintiff pro se.

Jay Sendzik for defendant (Sendzik & Sendzik, P.C., attorneys).

OPINION

Under New Jersey's recently amended alimony statute, a party may seek to terminate or modify his or her spousal support obligation based upon an actual or "prospective" retirement. N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(j)(1)-(3). What, however, does the term, "prospective retirement" actually mean?

For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases