1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 110 A.3d
  5. 110 A.3d 986 (2014)
 

SKEY & BHATTACHARYA LLC, v. EHSAN

Not in source.

110 A.3d 986 (2014)

439 N.J. Super. 643

SKEY & BHATTACHARYA LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Murshada EHSAN, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, Special Civil Part.

Decided December 12, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.S. Gerald Skey , Princeton, for plaintiffs (Skey & Bhattacharya LLC, attorneys).

Richard A. Mastro , Somerville, for defendant (Legal Services of Northwest Jersey, Somerset County Division, attorneys).

STATEMENT OF REASONS

This case raises the issue of whether a matrimonial attorney fee retainer agreement is subject to the Truth in Lending Act ("TILA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 to 1667(f). The dispute arises out of legal services provided by plaintiffs to defendant....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases