ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Philip Niblock appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree tampering. Niblock contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call two potential alibi witnesses and failing to fully cross-examine the victim and impeach her testimony. For reasons explained in a Memorandum
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.