PER CURIAM.
David Higgins appeals the judgment entered upon a jury's verdict convicting him of stealing over $500.00. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in denying Higgins' motion for a mistrial, in questioning him about his prior felony convictions, nor in finding him to be a persistent offender. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
