1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 218 S.W.3d
  5. 218 S.W.3d 417 (2007)
 

NESKE v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS

Nos. SC 87976, SC 87977.

218 S.W.3d 417 (2007)

Thomas NESKE, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Appellants. Firemen's Retirement System, et al., Respondents, v. City of St. Louis, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied May 1, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay A. Summerville, Jeffery T. McPherson, Deanna M. Wendler Modde, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, St. Louis, for Appellants in cause nos. SC 87976 & SC 87977.

James C. Owen, Katherine S. Walsh, Chesterville, for Respondents in cause no. SC 87976.

Daniel G. Tobben, David R. Bohm, Jeffrey R. Schmitt, St. Louis, for Respondents in cause no. SC 87977.

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

The City of St. Louis1 appeals the trial court's determination that it was required to pay the entire amount certified by the City's Police Retirement System ("PRS") and its Firemen's Retirement System ("FRS") in past fiscal years. The trial court's decision is affirmed, as there is no Hancock Amendment violation in that there is no new or increased activity required of the City, there is no conflict with Mo. Const...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases