PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. SNEDEN

Docket No. 141052. COA No. 285265.

788 N.W.2d 666 (2010)

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellant, v. Christopher SNEDEN, Defendant, and Taber McComiskey, Guardian for Julie M. McComiskey, Taber McComiskey, Personal Representative of the Estate of Taylen McComiskey, and Taber McComiskey, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 1, 2010.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the denial order. The Court of Appeals' interpretation of who qualifies as an "insured person" under the automobile insurance policy at issue is not a reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases