OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant, R.H., claims on appeal that fundamental error occurred during his trial when a witness testified that R.H. had invoked his Miranda right to remain silent, that the trial court erred in excluding a facsimile from evidence and that his consecutive sentences were unreasonable. Because the evidence in this case was overwhelming, the testimony regarding
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.