1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 927 N.E.2d
  5. 927 N.E.2d 385 (2010)
 

ADKINS v. VIGILANT INS. CO.

No. 06A01-0911-CV-530.

927 N.E.2d 385 (2010)

Bruce ADKINS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

May 17, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Hastings, Nicholas F. Baker, The Hastings Law Firm, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant Bruce Adkins.

Mark D. Gerth, Kightlinger & Gray, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee Vigilant Insurance Company.

OPINION

BRADFORD, Judge.

Appellant/Plaintiff Bruce Adkins appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee/Defendant Vigilant Insurance Company ("Vigilant"). On appeal, Adkins asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Vigilant. Concluding that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Vigilant, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases