PAYTON v. DIGIACOMO

No. 14-1453.

874 N.W.2d 673 (2015)

James PAYTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DiGIACOMO and Daveen DiGiacomo, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.

September 10, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Frerichs of Frerichs Law Office, P.C., Waterloo, for appellants.

James Payton, Waterloo, appellee pro se.

Considered by VOGEL, P.J., and POTTERFIELD and MULLINS, JJ.


John and Daveen DiGiacomo appeal from a district court order denying their application for attorney fees pursuant to a remedies clause of a purchase agreement with James Payton. Payton brought a breach-of-contract claim against the DiGiacomos, and a jury found for the DiGiacomos. The DiGiacomos contend they are entitled to attorney fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases