KENDALL 162 AVENUE CORP. v. PINEDA

No. 3D10-936.

34 So.3d 158 (2010)

KENDALL 162 AVENUE CORPORATION, d/b/a Sedano's Supermarket No. 29, Petitioner, v. Carol PINEDA, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Angones, McClure & Garcia, and Frank Angones; Billbrough & Marks, and G. Bart Billbrough, for petitioner.

Friedland Law Group, and Jonathan R. Friedland, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial court from continuing to preside over this action. The petitioner's motion to disqualify the trial judge rested on the fact that petitioner's counsel had sued the trial judge during the course of a recent judicial election.

As the record demonstrates, and as the respondent's counsel has appropriately agreed, the motion to recuse should have been granted. See Siegel v. State,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases