ABRAHAMSON v. NEITZEL

No. 15-cv-211-jdp.

109 F.Supp.3d 1055 (2015)

Shirley S. ABRAHAMSON, Joseph P. Heim, David Perkins, John V. Lien, Marilyn Wittry, and Hilde Adler, Plaintiffs, v. Scott NEITZEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Administration, Wisconsin Department of Administration, Ann Walsh Bradley, in her official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, N. Patrick Crooks, in his official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Michael J. Gableman, in his official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, David T. Prosser, Jr., in his official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Patience D. Roggensack, in her official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Annette Kingsland Ziegler, in her official capacity as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Pam Radloff, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Management Services, Wisconsin State Courts, Margaret Brady, in her official capacity as human resources officer for the Wisconsin State Courts, Doug La Follette, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Wisconsin, and Matt Adamczyk, in his official capacity as State Treasurer of Wisconsin, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

Signed May 19, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Stephen Peck , Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Maria S. Lazar , Wisconsin Department of Justice, Roger Alan Sage , Attorney Roger Sage, Kevin Michael St. John , St. John Law, LLC, Madison, WI, for Defendants.

Ann Walsh Bradley, Madison, WI, pro se.


ORDER

The court held a hearing on May 15, 2015, during which the parties presented oral argument on plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. For reasons stated more fully during the hearing, the court will deny plaintiffs' motion.

Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to restore Abrahamson to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases