CHARVAT v. ALLSTATE CORP.

No. 13 C 7104.

29 F.Supp.3d 1147 (2014)

Philip J. CHARVAT on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. The ALLSTATE CORPORATION, and Esurance Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed March 5, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander Holmes Burke , Burke Law Offices, LLC, Chicago, IL, Anthony Paronich , Edward A. Broderick , Broderick Law, P.C., Boston, MA, Matthew P. McCue , Law Office Of Matthew P. McCue, Pro Hac Vice, for Plaintiff.

Carl G. Roberts , Mark Levin , Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Mark L. Hanover , Dentons US LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.


ORDER

Defendants' motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to refer the "subsequent consent" issue to the FCC under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction, is denied.

STATEMENT

Defendants raise three arguments for dismissing plaintiffs TCPA claim: first, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases