RICHARDSON v. HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY

No. CIV. 3:09CV01220 AWT.

969 F.Supp.2d 237 (2013)

Maxine RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY, and Jane Doe, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 2, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elisabeth Ann Seieroe Maurer , Maurer & Associates, Ridgefield, CT, for Plaintiff.

Melanie E. Dunn , Peter A. Janus , Siegel, O'Connor, O'Donnell & Beck, P.C., Hartford, CT, for Defendants.


RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.

In her Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff Maxine Richardson ("Richardson") asserts claims against defendants Hartford Public Library (the "Library") and Jane Doe relating to Richardson's unsuccessful application for employment at the Library. Specifically, Richardson asserts claims in the nature of Quo Warranto (First Cause of Action); for discrimination in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases