1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 898 F.Supp.2d
  5. 898 F.Supp.2d 346 (2012)
 

IN RE VOLKSWAGEN AND AUDI WARRANTY EXTENSION LITIGATION

No. 07-md-01790-JLT.

898 F.Supp.2d 346 (2012)

In re VOLKSWAGEN AND AUDI WARRANTY EXTENSION LITIGATION.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

October 10, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. McNulty , McNulty Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA, Julie D. Goldstein , Fox Rothschild LLP, Warrington, PA, Kirk D. Tresemer , Brad R. Irwin , Randal R. Kelly , Irwin & Boesen, P.C., Denver, CO, Michael B. Bogdanow , Meehan, Boyle, Black & Bogdanow, PC, Adam M. Stewart , Edward F. Haber , Thomas G. Shapiro , Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Eugene R. Richard , Wayne, Richard & Hurwitz, LLP, Boston, MA, Russell D. Henkin , Sheryl S. Levy , Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Kevin C. Maxwell , Thomas Vaughan , Vaughan & Maxwell, P.A., Orlando, FL, Charles E. Mangan , John K. Weston , Sacks & Weston, Jenkintown, PA, Joel L. Dilorenzo , Joseph L. Tucker , K. Stephen Jackson , Jackson & Tucker PC, Jonathan H. Waller , Waller Law Office, Birmingham, AL, Jack Gorny , Fox Rothschild LLP, Atlantic City, NJ, Joseph G. Sauder , Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, Haverford, PA, Thomas P. Sobran , Hingham, MA, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr. , Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, MN, Ilan Chorowsky , Progressive Law Group, LLC Chorowsky Law Offices, Phillip A. Bock , Bock & Hatch, LLC, Chicago, IL, Brian G. Ruschel , Cleveland, OH, Mark Schlachet , Law Offices of Mark Schlachet, Beachwood, OH, John J. Pentz , Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew R. Levin , David A. Barry , Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, P.C., Boston, MA, Hugh J. Bode , Martin T. Galvin , Reminger & Reminger, Cleveland, OH, Daniel V. Gsovski , Jeffrey L. Chase , Natalie Flores Campbell , Herzfeld & Rubin, New York, NY, for Defendant.

ORDER

TAURO, District Judge.

In Defendants' Response to Class Counsel's Request for a Status Conference [# 337, at 1 n. 1], they raise the question of whether this case should be reassigned pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(K)(2). Local Rule 40.1(K)(2) states:

In all other cases in which the mandate of the appellate court requires further proceedings in this court, such proceedings shall not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases