ROEHL v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE

Case No. 11 C 7177.

857 F.Supp.2d 707 (2012)

Michael G. ROEHL, and all others, similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 9, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent Louis Ditommaso , Andrew Charles Murphy , Patrick Doyle Austermuehle , Peter Scott Lubin , DitommasoLubin, P.C., Oakbrook Terrace, IL, James S. Shedden , Tony Kim , Matthew Scott Burns , Schad, Diamond & Shedden, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Margo Lyn Ely , Mark Antonio Scarlato , City of Naperville, Naperville, IL, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1

SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Roehl filed a one-count complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant City of Naperville ("Naperville"), alleging that Naperville Ordinance 10-8-1 ("the 2009 Ordinance") violates the Fourteenth Amendment right of plaintiff, and those of a putative class of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases