1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 800 F.Supp.2d
  5. 800 F.Supp.2d 970 (2011)
 

MIDTRONICS, INC. v. AURORA PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS

No. 06 C 3917.

800 F.Supp.2d 970 (2011)

MIDTRONICS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AURORA PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, etc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 3, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Roderic Heard , Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL, Robert L. Wagner , Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Michael M. de Angeli , Jamestown, RI, Patrick J. Kelleher , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

On July 11, 2008 this Court issued its memorandum opinion and order ("Opinion," 2008 WL 2745941) reflecting its Markman analysis that construed language contained in various claims of United States Patent 5,821,756 (the "'756 Patent") owned by plaintiff Midtronics, Inc. ("Midtronics") and still in suit here.1 Extensive further litigative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases