1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 789 F.Supp.2d
  5. 789 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2011)
 

DOE v. MATCH.COM

No. CV 11-03795 SVW JENX.

789 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2011)

Jane DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MATCH.COM, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

May 25, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Webb , Law Office of Mark L. Webb, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Joseph E. Laska, III , Robert H. Platt , Manatt Phelps and Phillips LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

CORRECTED ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT DUE TO LACK OF ARTICLE III STANDING [13]

STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On May 3, 2011, Match.com ("Defendant") removed this case from the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Defendant is a popular online dating service with over one million subscribers.

Plaintiff was a subscriber of Defendant's service until January 2011. Plaintiff cancelled her subscription in January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases