1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 789 F.Supp.2d
  5. 789 F.Supp.2d 251 (2011)
 

MATAMOROS v. STARBUCKS CORP.

Civil Action No. 08-10772-NMG.

789 F.Supp.2d 251 (2011)

Hernan MATAMOROS, Sharon Sam Chan, and Kate Petersen, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 27, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Lichten , Hillary A. Schwab , Shannon E. Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Kate Petersen , pro se.

Jessica W.P. D'Arrigo , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, N.W. Washington, DC, Daniel L. Nash , Nathan J. Oleson , Kelly M. Scindian , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, Elianna J. Nuzum , James Rehnquist , Robert M. Hale , Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, Gregory W. Knopp , Akin, Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

Defendant Starbucks Corporation ("Starbucks") moves to certify as an appealable interlocutory order this Court's Memorandum & Order dated March 18, 2011, 2011 WL 1002740 ("the March M & O"), which held that defendant had violated the Massachusetts Tips Law, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 152A.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), this Court may certify an interlocutory order

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases