1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 787 F.Supp.2d
  5. 787 F.Supp.2d 298 (2011)
 

WIRELESS INK CORP. v. FACEBOOK, INC.

No. 10 Civ. 1841(PKC).

787 F.Supp.2d 298 (2011)

WIRELESS INK CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC. and Google, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 26, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy S. Pitcock , The Pitcock Law Group, New York, NY, David R. Stevens , Stevens Law Group, P.C., San Jose, CA, Jennifer Ishimoto , Banie & Ishimoto LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff.

Arastu Kabeer Chaudhury , Jonathan Paul Bach , Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, Kevin X. McGann , Aaron Chase , White & Case LLP, New York, NY, Elizabeth L. Stameshkin , Cooley Godward Kronish L.L.P., San Diego, CA, Eric Tierney , Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, Michael Graham Rhodes , Cooley, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Heidi Keefe , Mark Randolph Weinstein , Cooley Godward Kronish, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge:

Plaintiff Wireless Ink Corp. ("Wireless Ink") has asserted multiple claims against defendants Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") and Google, Inc. ("Google") for direct and indirect patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271, both literal and under the doctrine of equivalents. Defendants assert counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment (1) that the defendants have not infringed the patent-at-issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases