GOLDINGER v. DATEX-OHMEDA CASH BALANCE PLAN

Case No. C07-2081RAJ.

701 F.Supp.2d 1205 (2010)

Iosef GOLDINGER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DATEX-OHMEDA CASH BALANCE PLAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.

March 31, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Daniel Oswald, Law Offices of James D. Oswald, Seattle, WA, Ronald Dean, Ronald Dean ALC, Pacific Pallisades, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Adrienne E. Nelson, Seyfarth Shaw, San Francisco, CA, Mark Casciari, Seyfarth Shaw, Chicago, IL, Courtney E. Mertes, Jeffrey Bennett Youmans, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle, WA, for Defendant.


ORDER

RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court for the resolution of a legal issue that Plaintiffs first raised in their trial brief, and has now been the subject of supplemental briefing and oral argument. The court's resolution today means that there is no need for a trial at this time. Trial may be necessary later, however, because this order leaves two questions unresolved: was the ERISA plan at issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases