LIMBRIGHT v. HOFMEISTER

Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-107-KSF.

688 F.Supp.2d 679 (2010)

James H. LIMBRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs v. George HOFMEISTER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington.

February 1, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce N. Elliott, Joy M. Glovick, Conlin McKenney & Philbrick, P.C., Ann Arbor, MI, David Thomas Faughn, Michael J. Cox, Thomas Walcutt Miller, Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C., Lexington, KY, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew W. Mychalowych, Lindsay K. James, Siciliano Mychalowych Van Dusen & Feul, PLC, Farmington Hills, MI, for Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendants to dismiss or, alternatively, to require Plaintiffs to restate their claims under Kentucky law and with particularity. The parties having fully briefed the motion, it is ripe for consideration.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2000, Innovative Coating Technologies, Inc. ("ICT") purchased from James and Henry Limbright 100 percent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases