1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 874 F.3d
  5. 874 F.3d 1292 (2017)
 

BURGESS v. U.S.

No. 15-12045.

874 F.3d 1292 (2017)

Michael Frank BURGESS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

November 6, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erica Hashimoto , Georgetown Appellate Litigation Clinic, Amit Ramnik Vora , Georgetown University Law Center, Appellate Litigation Clinic, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellant.

David Paul Rhodes , David Charles Waterman , Arthur Lee Bentley, III , Tampa, FL, Roger Bernard Handberg, III , Orlando, FL, U.S. Attorney's Office, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District Judge.

Efficiency can be a virtue, particularly for a court. But sometimes we can have too much of even a good thing.1 That's what happened here. In this case, Petitioner-Appellant Michael Frank Burgess filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction and sentence. Although the government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases