1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 719 F.3d
  5. 719 F.3d 392 (2013)
 

MUMFREY v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.

No. 12-40419.

719 F.3d 392 (2013)

Tony MUMFREY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 10, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Stephen Morgan (argued), Morgan Law Firm, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James Bradley Spalding (argued), Kelley Riddle Edwards , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Tony Mumfrey ("Mumfrey") appeals the district court's denial of his motion to remand his retaliation suit against his former employer, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS"). He also appeals the district court's conclusions of law, arguing that it erroneously applied controlling law to conclude that Mumfrey did not prove retaliatory termination. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases