1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 58 A.3d
  5. 58 A.3d 414 (2013)
 

PETERS EX REL. PETERS v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.

No. 292, 2012.

58 A.3d 414 (2013)

Christopher PETERS, by his father and next friend Grady PETERS, and Grady Peters and Rosetta Peters, Individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: January 8, 2013.

Revised: January 9, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian Connor Bifferato, Esquire (argued), David W. deBruin, Esquire , Thomas F. Driscoll, III, Esquire , J. Zachary Haupt, Esquire , Bifferato, LLC, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorneys for Appellants.

Katharine L. Mayer, Esquire (argued), McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Mary A. Wells, Esquire (argued), Marilyn S. Chappell, Esquire , Denver, Colorado; Attorneys for Appellee.

Before HOLLAND, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices.

JACOBS, Justice:

On this 8th day of January 2013, the Court has determined that the Superior Court order granting the motion to dismiss of Texas Instruments Incorporated, the defendant-below, appellee, should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its September 30, 2011 opinion. We also affirm the Superior Court order dated May 7, 2012 denying the motion for reargument of Peters, the plaintiffs-below, appellants.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases