1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 6 A.3d
  5. 6 A.3d 1206 (2010)
 

JORDAN v. JORDAN

No. 31450.

6 A.3d 1206 (2010)

125 Conn.App. 207

James F. JORDAN III v. Diana M. JORDAN.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 23, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter M. Berry , for the appellant (defendant).

Carlo Forzani , Hartford, for the appellee (plaintiff).

DiPENTIMA, C.J., and LAVINE and LAVERY, Js.

PER CURIAM.

In this marital dissolution action, the defendant, Diana M. Jordan, claims that she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court impermissibly rendered its judgment more than 120 days after trial by issuing two corrected memoranda of decision.1 See General Statutes § 51-183b.2 The defendant's claim, however, is governed by General Statutes § 52-212a,3

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases