1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 205 Cal.App.4th
  5. 205 Cal.App.4th 552 (2012)
 

NEIGHBORS FOR SMART RAIL v. EXPOSITION METRO LINE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY

No. B232655.

205 Cal.App.4th 552 (2012)

139 Cal. Rptr. 3d 759

NEIGHBORS FOR SMART RAIL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EXPOSITION METRO LINE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY et al., Defendants and Respondents; LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

As modified May 9, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside , John M. Bowman and C.J. Laffer for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Nossaman, Robert D. Thornton , John J. Flynn III , Robert C. Horton , Lauren C. Valk and Lloyd W. Pellman for Defendants and Respondents.

Andrea Sheridan Ordin , County Counsel, and Ronald W. Stamm , Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Real Parties in Interest.

Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley, Tiffany K. Wright ; Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart and Bradley R. Hogin for Southern California Association of Governments, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, San Joaquin Council of Governments, Madera County Transportation Commission, Riverside County Transportation Commission, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority and San Francisco County Transportation Authority as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.

Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Michael H. Zischke , Andrew B. Sabey and Rachel R. Jones for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.

Carmen A. Trutanich , City Attorney, Andrew J. Nocas , Timothy McWilliams and Siegmund Shyu , Deputy City Attorneys, for City of Los Angeles as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest.

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

GRIMES, J.—

SUMMARY

This appeal arises under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)1 and involves the second phase of the construction of a light rail line along the Exposition Corridor connecting downtown Los Angeles with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases