1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 205 Cal.App.4th
  5. 205 Cal.App.4th 534 (2011)
 

HILLSIDE MEMORIAL PARK & MORTUARY v. GOLDEN STATE WATER CO.

No. B225058.

205 Cal.App.4th 534 (2011)

HILLSIDE MEMORIAL PARK AND MORTUARY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants; WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Interveners and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

September 27, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck , Lisabeth D. Rothman , Stephanie Osler Hastings and Russell M. McGlothlin for Defendant and Appellant Golden State Water Company.

Carmen A. Trutanich , City Attorney, Richard M. Brown and Julie C. Riley , Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant City of Los Angeles.

Cal Saunders , City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant City of Inglewood.

John L. Fellows III , City Attorney, and Patrick Q. Sullivan , Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant City of Torrance.

Robert V. Wadden , City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant City of Manhattan Beach.

Robert E. Shannon , City Attorney, J. Charles Parkin , Principal Deputy City Attorney; Lagerlof, Senecal, Gosney & Kruse and William F. Kruse for Defendant and Appellant City of Long Beach.

Alston & Bird, Edward J. Casey , Tammy L. Jones ; Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Deborah J. Fox and James M. Casso for Intervener and Appellant Water Replenishment District of Southern California.

Lemieux & O'Neill and Steven O'Neill for Intervener and Appellant West Basin Municipal Water District.

SmithTrager, Susan M. Trager and Laurel E. Adcock for Plaintiff and Respondent Hillside Memorial Park and Mortuary.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Curtis D. Parvin , Douglas E. Wance and Douglas J. Collodel for Plaintiff and Respondent Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company.

OPINION

KRIEGLER, J.

This is an appeal by the parties moving to amend a judgment (the moving parties)1 dating back to 1961 imposing a "physical solution"2 on the West Coast Groundwater Basin (the West Basin). The proposed amendment involved utilization of "dewatered" acreage in the West Basin, which was not part of the physical solution in the 1961 judgment. The trial court ruled in favor of two parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases