1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 184 Cal.App.4th
  5. 184 Cal.App.4th 1388 (2010)
 

GLENDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Nos. B212718, B213410.

184 Cal.App.4th 1388 (2010)

109 Cal.Rptr.3d 815

GLENDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF COMPTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

May 25, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Douglas J. Evertz; and Gillian van Muyden, General Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant Glendale Redevelopment Agency.

Goldfarb & Lipman, John T. Nagle and Juliet E. Cox for Plaintiff and Appellant Redevelopment Agency of the City of Compton.

McDonough Holland & Allen and T. Brent Hawkins as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Elizabeth M. Cortez, Assistant County Counsel, and Thomas M. Tyrrell, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ARMSTRONG, J.—

Appellants are community redevelopment agencies "empowered to prepare and effectuate a redevelopment plan for the elimination of blighted areas in the community." (Marek v. Napa Community Redevelopment Agency (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1070, 1082 [251 Cal.Rptr. 778,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases