1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 381 S.C.
  5. 381 S.C. 508 (2009)
 

CHASTAIN v. HILTABIDLE

No. 4487.

381 S.C. 508 (2009)

673 S.E.2d 826

John R. CHASTAIN and Katharine Chastain, Appellants, v. John H. HILTABIDLE, Talle G. Hiltabidle and C. Dan Joyner Company, Inc., Defendants, Of Whom C. Dan Joyner Company, Inc. is the, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided January 22, 2009.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Ehlies, II, of Greenville, for Appellants.

Samuel W. Outten and Sandi R. Wilson, both of Greenville, for Respondent.

WILLIAMS, J.:

In this action for negligence, Appellants argue the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent because Respondent's motion for summary judgment was procedurally defective, or, in the alternative, because the trial court erred in holding a realtor does not have a legal duty to investigate latent defects in property or to advise his or her clients on matters outside the scope of his or her expertise. We affirm.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases