1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GROSS v. GYNECARE
 

GROSS v. GYNECARE

No. A-0011-14T2.

LINDA GROSS and JEFFREY GROSS, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. GYNECARE, Defendant, and ETHICON, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Lifland (O'Melveny & Myers LLP) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP, and Mr. Lifland, attorneys; Mr. Lifland, of counsel; Kelly S. Crawford , Christy D. Jones (Butler Snow) of the Mississippi bar, admitted pro hac vice, and William M. Gage (Butler Snow) of the Mississippi bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel and on the brief).

Adam M. Slater argued the cause for respondents (Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Slater and David A. Mazie , of counsel; Mr. Slater, Mr. Mazie and David M. Estes , on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Espinosa and Rothstadt.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This appeal requires our consideration of the Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System (Prolift), a transvaginal surgical mesh designed, manufactured and marketed by defendants Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases