1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 998 F.3d
  5. 998 F.3d 852 (2021)
 

SALISBURY v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA

No. 20-55039.

998 F.3d 852 (2021)

Lawrence SALISBURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 16, 2021.

Amended June 7, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frances M. Campbell (argued), Nima Farahani , and Alexander G. Boone , Campbell & Farahani LLP, Sherman Oaks, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michelle M. Hugard (argued), Deputy City Attorney; Lance S. Gams , Chief Deputy City Attorney; George S. Cardona , Interim City Attorney; City Attorney's Office, Santa Monica, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: Carlos T. Bea, Amul R. Thapar, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Lawrence Salisbury filed a timely petition for rehearing en bane on May 3, 2021 [Dkt. No. 36]. Judge Collins has voted to deny the petition, and Judge Bea and Judge Thapar so recommend. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en bane and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en bane is DENIED, and no further petitions will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases