1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 666 F.Supp.3d
  5. 666 F.Supp.3d 655 (2023)
 

PETTEWAY v. GALVESTON COUNTY

No. 3:22-cv-57.

666 F.Supp.3d 655 (2023)

Terry PETTEWAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GALVESTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division.

Signed March 30, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernadette Samson Reyes , Pro Hac Vice, Sonni Waknin , Pro Hac Vice, UCLA Voting Rights Project, Los Angeles, CA, Caleb Jackson , Mark P. Gaber , Pro Hac Vice, Simone Leeper , Pro Hac Vice, Valencia Richardson , Pro Hac Vice, Alexandra Copper , Pro Hac Vice, Campaign Legal Center, Washington, DC, Neil G. Baron , Law Office of Neil G. Baron, League City, TX, Orion de Nevers , Pro Hac Vice, Campaign Legal Center, Washngton, DC, Chad W. Dunn , Brazil & Dunn, Austin, TX, for Plaintiffs Honorable Terry Petteway, Honorable Derrick Rose, Honorable Michael Montez, Honorable Penny Pope, Honorable Sonny James.

Neil G. Baron , Law Office of Neil G. Baron, League City, TX, Chad W. Dunn , Brazil & Dunn, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff Roosevelt Henderson.

Jason Brett Torchinsky , Pro Hac Vice, Shawn T. Sheehy , Pro Hac Vice, Dallin Brockbank Holt , Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC, Haymarket, VA, Robert Barron Boemer , Galveston County Legal Department, Galveston County Courthouse, Galveston, TX, Jordan Raschke Elton , Joseph R. Russo, Jr. , Greer, Herz & Adams, L.L.P., Galveston, TX, Angela Olalde , Greer Herz Adams LLP, League City, TX, Dalton L. Oldham , Austin, TX, James Edwin Trainor, III , Trainor Law Firm, PC, Austin, TX, Joseph M. Nixon , The Nixon Law Firm, PC, Houston, TX, for Defendants Texas Galveston County, Honorable Mark Henry.

Dallin Brockbank Holt , Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC, Haymarket, VA, Angela Olalde , Greer Herz Adams LLP, League City, TX, Jordan Raschke Elton , Joseph R. Russo, Jr. , Greer, Herz & Adams, L.L.P., Galveston, TX, for Defendant Dwight D. Sullivan.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the court is the defendants' motion to dismiss the United States' first amended complaint under Fed. R. of Civ. P.12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Dkt. 48. The court denies the motion.

I. BACKGROUND1

A....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases