ORDER
Per Curiam.
David Mrozak appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of attempted enticement of a child. He contends that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Upon review of the briefs
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.