ORDER
Per Curiam
Eddie Ross appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree robbery and the conviction was affirmed on appeal. Ross contends he was entitled to post-conviction relief because his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise a claim of, error regarding the admission of evidence related to a high-speed car chase that occurred after the robbery. For reasons explained in a Memorandum...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
