RISEN ENERGY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, and
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al., Consolidated Plaintiffs, and
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant, and
Sunpower Manufacturing Oregon, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor and Consolidated Defendant-Intervenor.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Jeffrey S. Grimson , Sarah M. Wyss , and Bryan P. Cenko , Mowry & Grimson, PLLC, of Washington, D.C. for consolidated plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd., Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. and JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
Jonathan M. Freed , Trade Pacific PLLC, of Washington, D.C. argued for consolidated plaintiffs Trina Solar Co., Ltd., Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Yancheng Trina Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd., Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Trina Solar (Hefei) Science & Technology Co., Ltd., and Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd. Also on the brief was Robert G. Gosselink.
William E. Perry and Adams C. Lee , Harris Bricken Sliwoski, LLP, of Seattle, WA for consolidated plaintiffs Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. and Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
Craig A. Lewis , Hogan Lovells US LLP, of Washington, D.C. argued for consolidated plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. and plaintiff-intervenors Canadian Solar Inc., Canadian Solar International Limited, Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc., Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc., CSI Cells Co., Ltd., and Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. Also on the brief were Jonathan T. Stoel and Lindsay K. Brown.
Joshua E. Kurland , Trial Attorney, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C. argued for defendant United States. Also on the brief were Brian M. Boynton , Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director and Reginald T. Blades, Jr. , Assistant Director. Of counsel was Leslie M. Lewis , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington D.C.
OPINION AND ORDER
Kelly, Judge:
Before the court are several Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record challenging various aspects of the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") final determination in its 2017-2018 administrative review of the antidumping duty ("ADD") order covering crystalline silicon...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
