OCTAL INC. v. UNITED STATES

Slip Op. 21-133 Court No. 20-03698.

539 F.Supp.3d 1291 (2021)

OCTAL INC., and OCTAL SAOCFSZ, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Advanced Extrusion, Inc., et al., Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 30, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel L. Porter and James P. Durling , Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiffs OCTAL Inc. and OCTAL SAOC-FSZ. With them on the brief were James Beaty and Ana Amador.

Jason F. Miller , Attorney-Advisor, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, D.C., argued for defendant United States. With him on the brief were Dominic L. Bianchi , General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson , Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.

Brooke M. Ringel and Paul C. Rosenthal , Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, of Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-intervenors Advanced Extrusion, Inc., Ex-Tech Plastics, Inc. and Multi-Plastics Extrusions, Inc. With them on the brief were Kathleen W. Cannon and Elizabeth C. Johnson .


OPINION

Before the court is a U.S. Court of International Trade ("USCIT") Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on the agency record filed by plaintiffs OCTAL SAOC-FSZ ("OCTAL SAOC"), the sole producer/exporter of subject merchandise from Oman, and OCTAL Inc., the sole importer of subject merchandise from Oman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases