CANADIAN SOLAR INC. v. UNITED STATES

Slip Op. 21-114 Consol. Court No. 19-00178.

537 F.Supp.3d 1380 (2021)

CANADIAN SOLAR INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al., Consolidated Plaintiffs, Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. et al., Intervenor Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of International Trade.

September 3, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryan P. Cenko and Sarah Wyss , Mowry & Grimson, PLLC, of Washington D.C. argued for Plaintiffs. With them on the brief was Jeffrey S. Grimson .

Robert G. Gosselink , Jonathan M. Freed , and Kenneth N. Hammer , Trade Pacific, PLLC, of Washington, D.C., for Consolidated Plaintiffs.

Jordan C. Kahn , Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, of Washington, D.C., argued for Intervenor Plaintiffs Jinko Solar Co., Ltd., Jinko Solar Import & Export Co., Ltd., Zhejang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. On the brief were Andrew T. Schutz and Kavita Mohan .

Richard L.A. Weiner , Rajib Pal , Shawn M. Higgins , and Justin R. Becker , Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Intervenor Plaintiffs Yingli Green Energy Holding Co., Ltd., Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Yingli Green Energy International Trading Co., Ltd., Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc., Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.

Craig A. Lewis , Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, of Washington D.C., for Intervenor Plaintiff Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.

Justin R. Miller , International Trade Field Office, U.S. Department of Justice, of New York, NY argued for the Defendant. With him on the brief was Tara K. Hogan , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Paul K. Keith , Office of Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, D.C.


OPINION AND ORDER

This action is a challenge to the final determination made by the United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce") in the Fifth Administrative Review of the countervailing duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules from the People...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases