1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 494 F.Supp.3d
  5. 494 F.Supp.3d 39 (2020)
 

ANGELOS v. TOKAI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

C.A. No. 17-11365-MLW.

494 F.Supp.3d 39 (2020)

Peter G. ANGELOS, Plaintiff, v. TOKAI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Jodie Pope Morrison, Lee H. Kalowski, Seth L. Harrison, Timothy J. Baberich, David A. Kessler, Joseph A. Yanchik, III, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., and Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Filed October 9, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Jacob, III , Pro Hac Vice, Goulston & Storrs PC, Joel M. Miller , Pro Hac Vice, Miller & Wrubel P.C., John G. Moon , Pro Hac Vice, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, Paul Glickman , Glickman Turley, LLP, Richard J. Rosensweig , Goulston & Storrs, PC, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.

Boris Feldman , Pro Hac Vice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Doru Gavril , Pro Hac Vice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA, Gideon A. Schor , Pro Hac Vice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, New York, NY, Michael J. Pineault , Anderson & Kreiger LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendant Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Boris Feldman , Pro Hac Vice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, Gideon A. Schor , Pro Hac Vice, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, New York, NY, Michael J. Pineault , Anderson & Kreiger LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants Jodie Pope Morrison, Lee H Kalowski, Seth L Harrison, Timothy J. Barberich, David A. Kessler, Joseph A Yanchik, III.

Charlene Sachi Shimada , Pro Hac Vice, Lucy Wang , Pro Hac Vice, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA, Matthew C. McDonough , S. Elaine McChesney , Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants BMO Capital Markets Corp., Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, William Blair & Company, L.L.C., Janney Montgomery Scott LLC.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. SUMMARY...45

II. THE MOTION TO DISMISS STANDARD...45

III. FACTS...46

IV. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...48

V. PLAINTIFF HAS NOT STATED A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM THAT THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT VIOLATED SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT...49

VI. PLAINTIFF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases