ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC. v. UNITED STATES

Slip Op. 20-171 Court No. 19-00198.

483 F.Supp.3d 1294 (2020)

ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Dixon Ticonderoga Co., Defendant-intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

December 1, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald A. Oleynik , Holland & Knight LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Plaintiff. With him on the brief were Antonia I. Tzinova , Liliana V. Farfan , and Dariya V. Golubkova.

Ashley Akers , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for Defendant. With her on the brief were Joseph H. Hunt , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph F. Clark , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Felicia L. Nowels , Akerman LLP, of Tallahassee, FL, argued for Defendant-Intervenor. With her on the brief was Sheryl D. Rosen.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc.'s ("Royal Brush") motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to U.S. Court of International Trade ("USCIT" or "CIT") Rule 56.2. Confidential Pl. [Royal Brush's] Mot. for J. on the Agency R., ECF No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases