POSCO v. U.S.

Slip Op. 19-52 Consol. Court No. 16-00227.

378 F.Supp.3d 1348 (2019)

POSCO, Plaintiff, and Nucor Corporation, Consolidated Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Steel Dynamics, Inc., AK Steel Corporation, Arcelormittal USA LLC, United States Steel Corporation, Hyundai Steel Company, and Government of Korea, Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

Dated: May 1, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald B. Cameron , Julie C. Mendoza , R. Will Planert , Brady W. Mills , Mary S. Hodgins , and Eugene Degnan , Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff POSCO and Defendant-Intervenors Hyundai Steel Company and the Government of Korea. Sabahat Chaudhary also appeared.

Alan H. Price , Christopher B. Weld , and Adam M. Teslik , Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Consolidated Plaintiff and Defendant-Intervenor Nucor Corporation. Cynthia C. Galvez , Derick G. Holt , Laura El-Sabaawi , Maureen E. Thorson , Stephanie M. Bell , Tessa V. Capeloto , Timothy C. Brightbill , and Usha Neelakantan also appeared.

Patricia M. McCarthy , Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendant United States. With her on the brief were Joseph H. Hunt , Assistant Attorney General, and Jeanne E. Davidson , Director. Of counsel was Emma T. Hunter , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Melissa M. Brewer , Kathleen W. Cannon , Paul C. Rosenthal , R. Alan Luberda , and Scott M. Wise , Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor ArcelorMittal USA LLC.

Daniel L. Schneiderman and Stephen A. Jones , King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor AK Steel Corporation.

Roger B. Schagrin , Christopher T. Cloutier , Elizabeth J. Drake , and Paul W. Jameson , Schagrin Associates, of Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Thomas M. Beline and Sarah E. Shulman , Cassidy Levy Kent (USA) LLP, of Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Intervenor United States Steel Corporation.


OPINION

This case reviews the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") methodology when selecting the highest calculated rate after applying facts otherwise available with an adverse inference ("adverse facts available" or "AFA") and Commerce's corroboration of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases