SEIDMAN v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK

M-751/752 September Term 2021 086627.

271 A.3d 817 (2022)

250 N.J. 270

Lawrence B. SEIDMAN and Arthur Wein, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK, S.L.A. and Jose B. Guerrero, Defendants-Movants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

March 28, 2022.


ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply brief (M-751) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-752) is denied. The parties may raise the issues on this motion before the Superior Court, Appellate Division, as appropriate, at the conclusion of Philip A. Vasta v. Spencer Savings Bank, S.L.A., and the other pending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases