GORE v. NAGEL

R-14 September Term 2020 085238.

248 A.3d 385 (2021)

246 N.J. 52

Debbie GORE and Doris Lance Smith, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bruce H. NAGEL; Andrew L. O'Connor; Robert H. Solomon; Nagel Rice, LLP; Derek Potts; Potts Law Firm, L.L.P.; Bailey Peavey Bailey Cowan Heckaman, PLLC; Bailey Peavey Bailey; Bailey Perrin Bailey; Mesh Litigation Center; Annie McAdams; Steelman McAdams; Junell & Associates, PLLC; K. Camp Bailey, PC; Burnett Law Firm; John Does 1-100; ABC Corps 1-100, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

April 9, 2021.


ORDER

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit having certified to the Supreme Court the following question of law pursuant to Rule 2:12A-3:

Whether New Jersey's public policy interest in regulating those who use its courts compels application of the State's contingency fee rules to a malpractice dispute between out-of-state plaintiffs and out-of-state lawyers?

And...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases