MCCLOSKEY v. PA. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

No. 1183 C.D. 2018.

219 A.3d 692 (2019)

Tanya J. MCCLOSKEY, Acting Consumer Advocate, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided July 11, 2019.

Reargument Denied September 4, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erin L. Gannon, Sr. Asst., Consumer Advocate, Harrisburg, for Petitioner.

David E. Screven , Asst. Counsel, Harrisburg, for Respondent.

BEFORE: HONORABLE P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge, HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge, HONORABLE ELLEN CEISLER, Judge.


The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitions this Court for review of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's (PUC) April 26, 2018 order (April 2018 Order) holding that Act 40 of 2016 (Act 40)1 does not apply to Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC) calculations. There are two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases