1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 384 S.C.
  5. 384 S.C. 571 (2009)
 

HOLLMAN v. WOOLFSON

No. 26725.

384 S.C. 571 (2009)

683 S.E.2d 495

John HOLLMAN, Respondent, v. Dr. Jonathon WOOLFSON, individually; TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC; TLC The Laser Center (Institute), Inc; Dr. Michael A. Campbell, individually; Optical Solutions, Inc.; and Optical Solutions of Bluffton, LLC, Defendants, of whom Dr. Jonathan Woolfson, TLC The Laser Center (Institute), Inc., TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC are Petitioners and Danielle Hollman, Respondent, v. Dr. Jonathon Woolfson, individually; TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC; TLC The Laser Center (Institute), Inc; Dr. Michael A. Campbell, individually; Optical Solutions, Inc.; and Optical Solutions of Bluffton, LLC, Defendants, of whom Dr. Jonathan Woolfson, TLC The Laser Center (Institute), Inc., and TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC are Petitioners and George E. Carter, Jr., and Jean Carter, Respondents, v. TLC Laser Eye Center (Institute), Inc. f/k/a TLC The Laser Center (Piedmont), Inc., Petitioner.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided September 21, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Howard Boyd, Jr., Ronald G. Tate, Jr., and J. Matthew Whitehead, of Gallivan, White & Boyd, PA, of Greenville, for Petitioners TLC The Laser Eye Center (Institute), Inc. and TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC; George C. Beighley and Mason A. Summers, of Richardson Plowden & Robinson, P.A., for Petitioner Woolfson.

Douglas F. Patrick and Stephen R.H. Lewis, of Covington, Patrick Hagins, Stern & Lewis, P.A., of Greenville; James Walter Fayssoux, Jr., and Paul S. Landis, of Anderson Fayssoux & Chasteen, of Greenville, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners have filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order of the circuit court allowing respondents to contact nonparty patients of petitioners. We grant the petition, dispense with further briefing, and vacate the order of the circuit court.

This matter involves three actions filed against petitioners for medical malpractice, fraud, and breach of contract arising out of LASIK eye surgeries. By order dated November 14...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases